United States v. Crabtree

by
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed defendants' convictions related to their involvement in an extensive Medicare fraud scheme. The court rejected Defendants Crabtree, Marks, and Salafias' double jeopardy argument where there were no issues from the first trial that were essential to the healthcare fraud conspiracy count in the second trial; held that there was sufficient evidence at trial to uphold defendants' convictions for the second trial; rejected defendants' trial-related claims; and held that the district court properly applied the organizer or leader and vulnerable victims enhancements to Defendant Rousseau's sentence. View "United States v. Crabtree" on Justia Law