Justia Criminal Law Opinion Summaries

The Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court’s order denying Paul Alfred Brown’s motion filed under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.851, holding that Brown was not entitled to relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and this court’s decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016). Brown was sentenced to death following a jury’s recommendation for death by a vote of seven to five. Brown’s sentence of death became final in 1990. The Supreme Court held that Hurst did not apply retroactively to Brown’s sentence of death and thus affirmed the denial of Brown’s motion. View "Brown v. State" on Justia Law

The Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court’s order denying Paul Alfred Brown’s motion filed under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.851, holding that Brown was not entitled to relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and this court’s decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016). Brown was sentenced to death following a jury’s recommendation for death by a vote of seven to five. Brown’s sentence of death became final in 1990. The Supreme Court held that Hurst did not apply retroactively to Brown’s sentence of death and thus affirmed the denial of Brown’s motion. View "Brown v. State" on Justia Law

The Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court’s order denying Mark Allen Davis’s motion filed under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.851, holding that Davis was not entitled to relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and this court’s decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016). Davis was sentenced to death following a jury’s recommendation for death by a vote of eight to four. Davis’s sentence of death became final in 1994. The Supreme Court held that Hurst did not apply retroactively to Davis’s sentence of death and thus affirmed the denial of Davis’s motion. View "Davis v. State" on Justia Law

The Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court’s order denying Mark Allen Davis’s motion filed under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.851, holding that Davis was not entitled to relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and this court’s decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016). Davis was sentenced to death following a jury’s recommendation for death by a vote of eight to four. Davis’s sentence of death became final in 1994. The Supreme Court held that Hurst did not apply retroactively to Davis’s sentence of death and thus affirmed the denial of Davis’s motion. View "Davis v. State" on Justia Law

The Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court’s order denying Gary Ray Bowles’ motion filed under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.851, holding that Bowles was not entitled to relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and this court’s decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016). Bowles was sentenced to death following a jury’s recommendation for death by a vote of eight to four. Bowles’ sentence of death became final in 1995. The Supreme Court held that Hurst did not apply retroactively to Bowles’ sentence of death and thus affirmed the denial of Bowles’ motion. View "Bowles v. State" on Justia Law

The Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court’s order denying Gary Ray Bowles’ motion filed under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.851, holding that Bowles was not entitled to relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and this court’s decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016). Bowles was sentenced to death following a jury’s recommendation for death by a vote of eight to four. Bowles’ sentence of death became final in 1995. The Supreme Court held that Hurst did not apply retroactively to Bowles’ sentence of death and thus affirmed the denial of Bowles’ motion. View "Bowles v. State" on Justia Law

The Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court’s order denying Michael Bernard Bell’s motion filed under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.851, holding that Bell was not entitled to relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and this court’s decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016). Bell was convicted of two counts of first degree murder and was sentenced to death following a jury’s unanimous recommendation of death for both murders. Bell’s sentences of death became final in 1998. The Supreme Court held that Hurst did not apply retroactively to Bell’s sentences of death and thus affirmed the denial of Bell’s motion. View "Bell v. State" on Justia Law

The Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court’s order denying Michael Bernard Bell’s motion filed under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.851, holding that Bell was not entitled to relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and this court’s decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016). Bell was convicted of two counts of first degree murder and was sentenced to death following a jury’s unanimous recommendation of death for both murders. Bell’s sentences of death became final in 1998. The Supreme Court held that Hurst did not apply retroactively to Bell’s sentences of death and thus affirmed the denial of Bell’s motion. View "Bell v. State" on Justia Law

The Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court’s order denying Melvin Trotter’s motion filed under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.851, holding that Trotter was not entitled to relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and this court’s decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016). Trotter was sentenced to death following a jury’s recommendation for death by a vote of eleven to one. Trotter’s sentence of death became final in 1997. The Supreme Court held that Hurst did not apply retroactively to Trotter’s sentence of death and thus affirmed the denial of Trotter’s motion. View "Trotter v. State" on Justia Law

The Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court’s order denying Melvin Trotter’s motion filed under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.851, holding that Trotter was not entitled to relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and this court’s decision on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016). Trotter was sentenced to death following a jury’s recommendation for death by a vote of eleven to one. Trotter’s sentence of death became final in 1997. The Supreme Court held that Hurst did not apply retroactively to Trotter’s sentence of death and thus affirmed the denial of Trotter’s motion. View "Trotter v. State" on Justia Law