Justia Criminal Law Opinion Summaries

In 1998, Michael Johnson, then 17, conspired with Aaron Johnson to murder Aaron’s roommate, Dustin Sean Parker. They planned the murder for hours, eventually deciding to bludgeon Parker to death with a metal barbell. After killing Parker, they wrapped his body in plastic bags and buried it in the woods. Johnson later bragged about the murder, leading to his arrest and conviction for deliberate-design murder. He was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.The Rankin County Circuit Court initially sentenced Johnson to life without parole. Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. Alabama, which deemed mandatory life-without-parole sentences for juveniles unconstitutional, Johnson sought post-conviction relief. The trial court vacated his sentence and held a new hearing, considering the Miller factors. Despite this, the court reinstated Johnson’s life sentence, ruling that the parole statute's application was not unconstitutional.The Supreme Court of Mississippi reviewed the case. Johnson argued that the trial court misapplied the law and facts and that Mississippi Code Section 99-19-101 required jury sentencing for juveniles. The court found that recent statutory amendments did not entitle Johnson to jury sentencing, as he was convicted before July 1, 2024. The court also upheld the trial court's application of the Miller factors, noting Johnson’s age, the premeditated nature of the crime, and the lack of evidence suggesting his immaturity or inability to understand the consequences of his actions. The court affirmed the trial court’s decision, maintaining Johnson’s life sentence without parole. View "Johnson v. State" on Justia Law

Derrick Chatman was convicted of two counts of sexual battery by a jury in the Adams County Circuit Court. The jury was also instructed on the lesser-included offense of gratification of lust for both counts. Chatman appealed, arguing that the jury’s verdict was ambiguous and not fully responsive to the verdict forms, which included the lesser-included offense. He claimed the trial court erred by not directing the jury to retire for further deliberations.The Adams County Circuit Court sentenced Chatman to thirty years for each count, with fifteen years suspended and fifteen years to serve consecutively. Chatman filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, alternatively, for a new trial, which the trial court denied. On appeal, Chatman raised the issue of the ambiguous verdict for the first time, arguing that the trial court should have directed the jury to deliberate further under Mississippi Rule of Criminal Procedure 24.3.The Supreme Court of Mississippi reviewed the case and agreed that the jury’s verdict was ambiguous regarding the sexual battery charges. The court found that the trial court should have directed the jury to retire for further deliberations. The court noted that the jury’s general verdicts of guilty did not clarify whether they found Chatman guilty of sexual battery or the lesser-included offense of gratification of lust. Consequently, the court reversed Chatman’s convictions for sexual battery.The Supreme Court of Mississippi reversed and remanded the case for either a new trial on the sexual battery charges or for resentencing on two counts of gratification of lust, at the option of the State. The court emphasized that the ambiguity in the jury’s verdict required this remedy to ensure a fair and just outcome. View "Chatman v. State of Mississippi" on Justia Law

Soweto Ronnell Love pled guilty to two counts of attempting to acquire or obtain possession of a controlled substance by forged prescription and was sentenced as a habitual offender to five years on each count, to run consecutively. Love later filed a pro se Motion for Post-Conviction Collateral Relief (PCR), challenging the voluntariness of his guilty plea. The Tate County Circuit Court dismissed his PCR motion without an evidentiary hearing, finding that Love's plea was voluntary based on the record.On appeal, the Mississippi Court of Appeals affirmed the circuit court's dismissal of Love's PCR motion in a divided decision. The Court of Appeals held that a factual basis existed for Love's plea and that he failed to show his plea was involuntary. Love then filed a pro se motion for rehearing, which was denied, and subsequently filed a petition for writ of certiorari, which the Supreme Court of Mississippi granted.The Supreme Court of Mississippi found that the circuit court erred in dismissing Love's PCR motion without an evidentiary hearing. The court held that Love was misinformed about the minimum penalty he faced as a habitual offender, which amounted to a misapplication of the law and plain error. The court also found that the record did not confirm that Love knowingly pled guilty as a habitual offender. Consequently, the Supreme Court reversed the circuit court's dismissal of Love's PCR motion and the Court of Appeals' decision, remanding the case to the circuit court for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether Love voluntarily pled guilty as a habitual offender. View "Love v. State of Mississippi" on Justia Law

Jatavis Williams was indicted for first-degree murder after the shooting death of Tacari Walker. On November 9, 2020, police responded to a shooting in Columbus, Mississippi, where they found Walker unresponsive. Witnesses indicated that Williams and Walker had been arguing prior to the incident. Williams turned himself in the next day. At trial, Williams claimed self-defense, stating that Walker had threatened him and approached his vehicle aggressively. However, an eyewitness testified that Walker was unarmed and appeared happy before the shooting.The Lowndes County Circuit Court conducted a jury trial from August 22 to August 26, 2022. The jury found Williams guilty of first-degree murder, and he was sentenced to life imprisonment. Williams filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial, which the trial court denied. He then appealed, arguing that the conviction was against the overwhelming weight of the evidence and that the trial court erred in denying his request for a mistrial due to disruptions during the trial.The Supreme Court of Mississippi reviewed the case and affirmed the lower court's decision. The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the mistrial. The disruptions, including an outburst from the victim’s mother and an inappropriate video during a witness's Zoom testimony, were addressed by polling the jury, who indicated they could remain impartial. The court also found that the jury's verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, as the jury had properly considered the self-defense claim and found it unconvincing. Therefore, the conviction and sentence were upheld. View "Williams v. State of Mississippi" on Justia Law

On March 7, 2018, a ninth grader named Becky was kidnapped at gunpoint by Jimmy David Williams, a friend of her stepfather, while she was on her way to school. Williams forced Becky into his vehicle, drove to a secluded area, and sexually assaulted her. After the assault, Williams dropped Becky off at school, where she immediately reported the incident to her JROTC instructor. Becky was taken to a hospital for a sexual assault examination, which revealed physical evidence consistent with her account. DNA evidence linked Williams to the crime.The Jackson County Circuit Court convicted Williams of sexual battery and sentenced him to thirty years in prison without the possibility of parole. Williams filed a motion for a new trial or a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, arguing that the conviction was against the overwhelming weight of the evidence due to conflicting testimony. The trial court denied his motion, leading to Williams's appeal.The Supreme Court of Mississippi reviewed the case and upheld the trial court's decision. The court found that the jury had appropriately resolved the conflicting testimonies, including a statement from a social worker suggesting Becky had been gang-raped by multiple men, which Becky denied. The court emphasized that the jury's role is to assess the credibility of witnesses and weigh the evidence. Given the substantial evidence supporting the conviction, including immediate reports by Becky and corroborating DNA evidence, the court concluded that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Therefore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Williams's motion for a new trial. The Supreme Court of Mississippi affirmed Williams's conviction and sentence. View "Williams v. State of Mississippi" on Justia Law

In 2023, Christopher Sheely was convicted for possessing more than one-tenth gram but less than two grams of methamphetamine. He was sentenced to two years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections, with the remainder suspended for post-release supervision upon completing a drug and alcohol program. Sheely appealed, arguing that the trial court erred by denying his proposed broken chain of custody jury instruction and that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict.The Forrest County Circuit Court initially handled the case, where Sheely was found guilty by a jury. Sheely moved for a directed verdict and later for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial, both of which were denied by the trial judge. The trial court found that an adequate chain of custody had been established and that Sheely failed to produce evidence of tampering or substitution of the evidence.The Supreme Court of Mississippi reviewed the case. The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict that Sheely knowingly possessed a felony amount of methamphetamine. The court found that the jury was presented with enough evidence to conclude that Sheely was aware of the presence and character of the methamphetamine and that it weighed more than one-tenth of a gram. Additionally, the court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing Sheely’s proposed chain of custody jury instruction, as Sheely failed to present evidence of probable tampering or substitution. The Supreme Court of Mississippi affirmed the lower court’s decision. View "Sheely v. State of Mississippi" on Justia Law

On September 7, 2019, Kemond Jones shot Ethan Powell eight times with a 9 mm handgun in the Beechwood Estates neighborhood in Warren County. Powell died from his injuries later that morning. Witness Danny Guice identified Jones as the shooter, and Jones turned himself in later that day. At trial, Guice testified about a prior disagreement between Jones and Powell, and forensic evidence confirmed the cause of death. Jones claimed self-defense, stating Powell slapped him and reached for a gun before he shot him.The Warren County Circuit Court convicted Jones of murder and sentenced him to forty years, with ten years suspended. Jones's motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial was denied. He appealed, arguing that the trial court erred by allowing improper evidence and that the verdict was against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.The Supreme Court of Mississippi reviewed the case and affirmed the lower court's decision. The court held that the prosecutor's statement during the opening was not evidence and did not prejudice the jury. Additionally, the court found that the jury's verdict was supported by sufficient evidence, including eyewitness testimony from Guice. The court also determined that the Weathersby rule, which requires the acceptance of the defendant's version of events if they are the only eyewitnesses, did not apply because there was conflicting eyewitness testimony from the prosecution. The court concluded that the trial court did not commit reversible error and upheld the conviction and sentence. View "Jones v. State of Mississippi" on Justia Law

Jessica Walker was convicted by a jury of knowingly possessing methamphetamine with a firearm enhancement in the Newton County Circuit Court. The incident occurred on October 21, 2020, when Walker and her then-boyfriend, Richard Buckley, approached a safety checkpoint. Buckley, who initially drove Walker's vehicle, switched seats with her because he lacked a driver's license. During the stop, Deputy Donna Chapman smelled unburned marijuana and found a handgun and a small amount of marijuana in the vehicle. A subsequent search revealed 0.245 grams of methamphetamine between the driver’s seat and the center console. Walker was arrested, while Buckley was released and not investigated further.Walker was indicted on one count of possession of methamphetamine with a firearm enhancement. She pled not guilty, asserting that the methamphetamine belonged to Buckley and that she was unaware of its presence. During the trial, Walker sought to introduce evidence of Buckley’s prior drug-related offenses, but the circuit judge ruled this evidence inadmissible under Mississippi Rule of Evidence 404(b). The jury found Walker guilty, and she was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment, with three years suspended. Her motion for a new trial was denied, leading to her appeal.The Supreme Court of Mississippi reviewed the case and found that the State failed to present sufficient evidence connecting Walker to the methamphetamine. The court noted that while Walker owned the vehicle and was in proximity to the drugs, there were no additional incriminating circumstances to establish constructive possession. The court held that the evidence was insufficient to support Walker’s conviction and reversed and rendered the judgment. View "Walker v. State of Mississippi" on Justia Law

The case revolves around Katherine Harris, who was convicted for aggravated DUI. While driving with a blood-alcohol concentration (BAC) twice the legal limit, Harris crashed into a deputy sheriff and his patrol vehicle, causing severe injuries to the deputy. Before trial, Harris requested public funds to hire her own experts, a toxicologist and an accident reconstructionist, to counter the State’s evidence. However, her blood sample, which she had not requested to be preserved, had been destroyed according to routine procedure nine months after testing. The judge denied her requests for expert funding, finding them broad and theoretical, and Harris failed to articulate concrete reasons how these proposed independent experts would specifically assist her defense.In Mississippi, the discretion to grant or deny an indigent defendant funds to retain an independent expert lies with the trial court. The court found that Harris failed to articulate how her own experts would actually assist her defense. Furthermore, the State’s case did not rely exclusively on these two experts and her BAC. The State called additional witnesses who established the patrol car was clearly visible with its blue lights flashing, and multiple other vehicles successfully passed the patrol car before Harris slammed into it. Witnesses also testified Harris smelled like alcohol, failed a field sobriety test, admitted she had been drinking, and tested positive for alcohol on a portable breathalyzer at the scene.The Supreme Court of Mississippi affirmed Harris’s conviction and sentence, discerning no abuse of discretion in the judge’s denial of Harris’s request for expert funds. Based on the overwhelming evidence supporting Harris’s aggravated DUI conviction, the judge’s discretionary denial, even if erroneous, was not so prejudicial as to render her trial fundamentally unfair. View "Harris v. State of Mississippi" on Justia Law

The case revolves around Christopher Smith, who was convicted of first-degree murder for the death of Nakisa Benson. Smith was initially deemed incompetent to stand trial but was later found competent. During the jury selection process, Smith's counsel exercised ten peremptory strikes on potential jurors, nine of whom were white. The State raised a reverse-Batson challenge, arguing that the strikes were racially motivated. The circuit judge conducted a Batson hearing and disallowed several of Smith's strikes, finding that the reasons provided were not race-neutral.Smith appealed his conviction to the Court of Appeals, arguing that the trial court erred by admitting certain autopsy photographs and by overruling five of his peremptory strikes. The Court of Appeals found no error and affirmed the conviction. Smith then filed a petition for writ of certiorari, contending that the Court of Appeals erred in its Batson analysis with respect to two jurors. He requested that the case be remanded for a proper Batson hearing.The Supreme Court of Mississippi reviewed the case and the Batson challenge. The Court gave great deference to the trial court's findings, stating that it would not overrule a trial court on a Batson ruling unless the record indicated that the ruling was clearly erroneous or against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. The Court found that Smith's counsel had shown a clear pattern of striking jurors because of their race, which was evident from his choice of words during the trial court’s Batson hearing. The Court affirmed the judgments of the Court of Appeals and of the Copiah County Circuit Court, denying Smith's request for a Batson hearing on the two jurors. View "Smith v. State" on Justia Law